top of page



A 14 year old schoolboy has had his cauliflower footwear taken from him at school because they don't follow the school's strict new uniform guidelines. Colin Rafferty, of class 9Z, was told that his brand new Cruciferous Brassicas, which cost £3 a pair at a local supermarket, did not strictly conform to The Willows Academy Trust's uniform policy, as they were, technically, vegetables.


The “footwear” in question was confiscated and he was given some real shoes from lost property to wear until his family could purchase more suitable attire. TWAT staff met students at the school gates on the first day of term to check that their uniform complied with the school's new, stricter rules before letting them to go to class.




Colin's mother, Carol, 29, was furious: 'Colin arrived at school to be told that cole crops were no longer deemed suitable footwear for school. He was mortified! He wore them all last year and nobody seemed to care! There's nothing in the school's rules about not wearing a cauliflower on each foot. It's a disgrace!'


One of TWAT's Senior Assistant Headteachers, Ms Newbie, has agreed to hand back Colin's own footwear as they were starting to go off, had become infested with caterpillars and were generally, stinking up her office.



She refused to comment on this individual case, but issued a press release stating the following:' The Willows Academy Trust uniform policy can be seen clearly on the TWAT website with images showing acceptable footwear. Root vegetables, brassicas and soft fruits are not, and never have been, permitted. Our new uniform policy has been in place since the beginning of September and students wearing incorrect uniform have been sent home to change'.



Ms Newbie refused discuss Ms Rafferty's accusation that another boy had been allowed to wear half a butternut squash on each foot, but admitted that an exception had been made for a student with a pre-existing medical condition, but only during indoor PE.




In an astonishing portent of doom prediction, the Sunday Sport newspaper actually called one right.


On the 15th July 1990, Britain's favourite news failure reported that England football legend Paul Gascoigne's face had materialised on the White Cliffs of Dover. While no one other than poor, misguided Tory voters believed this bilge at the time, it has sadly come to pass.


32 years later, due to a recent build up of excrement being dumpy-pumpied into the English Channel by water authorities, the backwash has soiled the otherwise pristine Kent cliffs.


Leading expert in cable-laying, Professor Vince Crimp explained, 'Due to an abnormal tempestuous vortex current of backsplatter, the effluence pebble-dashed the chalk frontage.


'It is still a mystery to science why it has formed into the face of Mr Gascoigne, but perhaps not a mystery to middle-aged football fans who are also disgusted with the level of environmental disregard being shown by those supposedly in charge. Or, more correctly, in discharge. Whether or not this is an immense opportunistic dirty protest is impossible to tell.'


Water authorities have washed their hands of the shituation, and the government has confirmed that this is yet another backlog they won't touch.



Hat tip to lockjaw




Liverpool police investigating the murder of a 9 year old girl were today left with egg on their faces when it was revealed they’d arrested the man the gunman was trying to kill, not the gunman himself.


“When witnesses said he was the victim, I thought they meant in the Hillsborough sense ie the person who’d committed the crime,” explained Detective Inspector A.A. Calmdown.


“Anyway, doesn’t ‘victim’ mean anyone from Liverpool?” added his assistant, DS Curlyperm.


However, both officers stressed that they were confident they would soon have the guilty man in custody, “at which point we can begin the process of endless public enquiries and commissions to show it wasn’t his fault. Unless of course he turns out to be a Mancunian.”


bottom of page