top of page

Reform UK has pledged to break the stranglehold of the mainstream mathematical establishment by launching an urgent review into whether two plus two really needs to equal four.


Party sources say the answer “four” has been imposed on Britain for generations by an increasingly out-of-touch uniparty consensus of Labour, the Conservatives, teachers, accountants, engineers and people capable of counting.


“For decades we’ve been told that if you have two things and someone gives you another two things, you have four things,” said a Reform spokesman. “But nobody ever asks ordinary British people what they think the answer should be.


Reform believes there is considerable public appetite for five.


“Five is bigger than four,” the spokesman continued. “Britain deserves bigger numbers. Illegal immigration is out of control, taxes are too high and millions of people feel ignored. In those circumstances, insisting the answer is still four shows just how little the establishment has learned.”


Asked whether there was any evidence that two plus two could equal five, the spokesman accused the reporter of “talking Britain down”.


Critics have pointed out that changing the answer to five could cause difficulties for engineering, banking and calculating change in pubs.


Why not join our WhatsApp channel, NewsBiscuit Daily Posts? You can access the latest output from NewsBiscuit and share posts easily with friends, family and colleagues using WhatsApp. Get some biscuits in your pocket (sorry about the crumbs, though) by clicking here.


June 2026, Queston 1


The probability that the government retrospectively changes the student loan scheme in a way unfavourable to students is determined, from historic data, to be p=0.2 in any given year.


The probability of an unfavourable change in any year is independent from all previous years.


A newly qualified student has 40 years to repay their student loan before it is written off.


Calculate:


(a) The expected number of unfavourable changes to student loan repayment terms in the next 40 years. Show your workings . Expletives should be written in pencil and crossed through. [ 4 marks ]


(b) The probability that students will vote for any of the political parties involved in stitching them up. [ 1 mark ]


(c) The probability that graduates will avoid promotions or reduce their working hours or go sick and claim benefits in order to reduce or avoid their student loan repayments [ 1 mark ]


(d) Companies employing new graduates have not been offering to repay student debt. What is the probability that this situation will improve in the next 3 years? Explain your answer. [ 2 marks ]


Image: Newsbiscuit Archive


A Qualifications Scotland spokesperson has defended a controversial Higher Maths paper after pupils said that it was "unrecognisable" from the paper they had prepared for in class. The pupils said that the wording of the questions was so confusing that they did not know what was being asked.


Sir Humphrey responded: " A constriction of the channels of communication, that culminated in a condition of organisational atrophy and administrative paralysis may have lead to the mix-up.  Whilst we accept that there is a real dilemma here, in that, while it has been exam board policy to regard the responsibility of teachers and adjudicators as a responsibility of the Exam board, the question of questions policy can cause confusion between the policy of questions and the question of policy, especially when responsibility for the administration of the policy of questions conflicts, or overlaps with, responsibility for the question of the administration of questions. I hope that clears things up".


He added. "Please put you pens down and turn over your papers. Application forms for jobs at McDonalds are available as you leave".



Image credit: Wix AI (edited)

bottom of page